ANTICS OF ANTI-HINDU MEDIA
The problem with the Indian media is its inferiority complex when it comes to white skin. So anything that reeks of Hinduism deserves to be sneered while anything from Western masters should be revered.
The following are the antics of the great Indian media which delights in raping news to suit its own end:
1. Always blame Hindus for communal violence ignoring the mass of evidence against Islamic and Christian perpetrators.
2. During communal violence, don’t send your cameras to the scene of minority violence, focus the archlight on majority violence only (read Modi and Bajrang Dal).
3. When Hindus react, give them generous advice like preserving peace and brotherhood — Two wrongs do not make a right.
4. When Muslims attack for any flimsy reason, give a direct apology as in the case of Muslim attack on Hindu and Deccan Herald.
5. Project the Hindu Gurus in a bad light and project them like villains even when there is not even a shred of evidence against them — Read the Shankaracharya.
6. Ignore the criminal charges against priests and missionaries – Read Graham Staines and the Church.
7. Ridicule Hindu emotions as superstitions while project the same superstitions as personal faith when it comes to the minorities.
8. Rave over Islamic superstars like Aamir Khan and Shahruk Khan while going low on Hindu heroes like Akshay Kumar and Hrithik Roshan.
9. Always make it a point to undermine all that which makes Hindus proud of Indian tradition.
10. Make it a point to throw the spotlight on dark side of Hinduism only like caste, sati, untouchability et al.
There are more. Do point it out to me. My next book is on Exposing Indian Media and its anti-Hindu bias.
-----Email: greathindu@in.com
Fascist Trends in Indian Media
February 5th, 2009 at 5:56 am
emmarcee>>>>“I showed you how theory of “maya” (which you use in most other posts) is not comaptible with the E+MC2″
Harsh responds>>>How is that? Could you explain why it isn’t compatible?
Interesting topic, as usual most of the hindus rush to claim all scietific inventions in line with Veda, without knowing what!!!. I’m not sure if you can scientifically understand and debate ‘Relativity’.
To the point…
1)Before Relativity, people regarded space and time as two distinct and unconnected entities. How are you going to relate TIME & SPACE with MAYA?
2) In line with Einstein’s relativity, Big Bang says, ‘It all started at one Point’ ie, both Time & Space. How do you relate MAYA to this?
February 5th, 2009 at 6:36 am
Of course i’m into science and i have read quite a lot about relativity.
1)Before Relativity, people regarded space and time as two distinct and unconnected entities. How are you going to relate TIME & SPACE with MAYA?
I donno what MAYA is. Ask krish_eashwar about it. All I know is that Vedas aren’t inconsistent with Theory of relativity. Any inconsistency, point it out.
2) In line with Einstein’s relativity, Big Bang says, ‘It all started at one Point’ ie, both Time & Space. How do you relate MAYA to this?
Now you see, this one’s consistent to God created the universe theory. Before that there was no time nor space. Scriptures even point out about the big crunch. Scriptures say that every 43,20,000 years universe ends and starts again.
February 5th, 2009 at 8:45 am
Emmarcee alias harsh,
thanks emmarcee you can comment on your emmarcee name itself, what you have posted in emmarcee same you have posted in harsh name also. No matter let us continue our discussion dear friend.
February 5th, 2009 at 9:08 am
emmarcee,
Regarding budh viz hindu, since has not completed yet let us continue .
Bhudhism;through Sanyas dharma one can attain nirvana that is sunya.
ultimate of nirvana is suniya
they have not accepted the theory of hindusim which says that only one existence. The one has divided as many division or universe that is bcos of ego with thamo guna.
Reason bhudism vanish india is that. They have no answer for this question.
Who has seen nirvana/?
their answer is Lord bhud
So existence of lord remain there, how can you say there is nothing but only suniya. they didnot answer that.
Also another main question is when everybody become saniyas who will there to feed saniyas?
they failed to answer thats wat the different between bhud and hinduism.
otherewise same vedanta for them too and they too accept sangiya
February 5th, 2009 at 9:14 am
emmarcee,
I realy felt bad that i would have used some harsh ward, which would have wound you, I ask parden for that. You and Sapr alias simon both are nice .
Your fear about minarity is valid one. But i am sure that this hindu fanatics also have got same fear about you. If both understand or there must be a person who has to bridge gap between them.
I really sorry if i hurt you.
Thanks i continue my disscussion & tomo i am going outstation along with my colleague mr stanley hope we back saturday night.
February 5th, 2009 at 9:44 am
Emmarcee,
“You first say the “universe” was not “created” , then say that “when it’s created”. So what is it? You use Bhouthik ie “the material world” and say that no one can change anything. This is quite contradictory to your stand that universe itself is a Maya. (that is what i understand from the Jagara Swapna theory). If it is Maya and th”
Good Let me try put it little different that let us start from us and there on universel creation. So that you may understand maya.
Consider how universe will go same way it will come back.
Now emmarcee can able to see the total universe. But all the universe is brathishtitham to your eye. When you close your eye…Without your eye meterial universe is not there everything all vanish (maya). but meterials are brithistitham to sun becouse of sun only meterial are there you agree. first your eye then meterial now becose of sun meterial. All meterial can vanish under sun and they can be with sun. similarly sun is brathistitham to vayu. it can vanish under vayu. vayu is brathistitham to agash. under agash vayu can vanish. Agash vanish to vigyana Puthee or ego state ( this is where you or vary) when hindusim is correct up to this stage one can accept the next stage too. Ego state vanish to anantha…and anantha vanish to thuriyatheetham.
I am not able to explain in english it got to be explain either by tamil or sanscrit only this two launguge has indepth meanings in every ward. Do you know tamil. This are the two greatest launguages of india which is treasure for india.
As per our theory bcos of ego its happened if a person abandon ego then existence is one. till then he has to go with dual part which is maya. For this simple theory if you go time space you wont get answer. Time and space only till dual is there when there is only one where is space and what is time to see to whom for what? no time no space but existence is only one.
It is difficult to understand and not easy to agree too. When you go in to and with shratha can only make it understan.
will continue…
February 5th, 2009 at 10:46 am
I am not emmarcee. lol… I infact justified Hinduism. I just didn’t know about Maya. So I referred to you
February 5th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
ALL PLEASE READ
http://www.hinduwisdom.info/Conversion.htm
February 7th, 2009 at 10:09 pm
“I showed you how theory of “maya” (which you use in most other posts) is not comaptible with the E+MC2″
How is that? Could you explain why it isn’t compatible?
I am talking about Krishna’s stand that nothing can be really created that is not preexistent. I take it as a ploy to just use whatever new comes up in the scientific field.
February 7th, 2009 at 10:15 pm
brathistitham
cOULD YOU PLEASE EXPLAIN THE WORD? Is this about being transcendent? ( need to spellcheck)
February 9th, 2009 at 1:22 am
harsh/emmarcee,
“I am not emmarcee. lol… I infact justified Hinduism. I just didn’t know about ”
Very sorry, some time i write according to my intuition which would have been wrong.
February 9th, 2009 at 1:56 am
Emmarcee,
The science wat persist now is neither true nor false. some they nearing to reality some issues they are not able to. For example any one can stop yavanam(lad/les) to kowmaram(middle age) to varthakiyam (after 60), Muppu(old age),Pini (ailment), maranam (death).. can science address to this issue. Any scientific discovery or any scientist triying where all being is going after death. How perfect of sun vayu,climate how its working do they know.,
Scientist trying discover that uranus/neptune what happened?
Am telling you that when the touch moon they say that bcos there is no oxigen/water they claim there is no being. Let me ask a question to them that they know about oxigen only about some hundreds years back. Just becouse the understand about oxigen only all being live, they should know that this universe and all being live for cores and crores of year. here its oxigen there it would have been different which they may discover only after laks of year later. they think only in thier thinking form only being must be there? poor scientist it may not be… becouse when any movie come they alien or space invader they discripe like how human like nose,eye head, mouth but little different. All your my perception only according to your and my level of thinking. But truth need not be same. This is what pramana gyan or arivu.
I showed you how theory of “maya” (which you use in most other posts) is not comaptible with the E+MC2″
Now could you please explain what is E+mc2 i dont know the terminology. Once i understand your question then i may continue please.
Maya: nothing what you see is not true — truth exists which cant be dicripable gaugeable,measurable,killable it exist thats why you are existing. Which one is inducing that i am here iam here even if one loose his hands, legs, eye sight every of his body part but able to survie till his survival he thinks i am i am that is maya. but your discovery of innerself is keep changing from yavanam to varthakiyam.
One can even think about ownself how we differ from the age of 5 your needs /thinking and age of 14 needs and thinking age of 20 similarly 40 and finally 70’s it keep changing. Tell me frankly anythat keep change is true or that which is not changeble is true. Since what you able to see is keep changeble hence is not true that is maya (but its insticate that it is true) But Deeran one who able to know the real fact will get out of this net.
February 10th, 2009 at 6:45 am
Nirmala Venkatesh’s past record shows why did she do it to blame pub rather than sri ram sene. As many people from Udupi know quite openly about her illicit affairs with karnataka home minister dr. v. s acharya for the past many years. They used to enjoy in udupi hotel karavali when i was working in the said hotel. It is nothing but a gesture of keeping orange monkeys out of lime light all done for the sake of dr. v.s acharya by his keep nirmala venkatesh.
February 10th, 2009 at 11:47 am
Krishna, science has cracked some secrets of aging, ofcourse. I tend to take the best from both.
BTW, what is brathistitham?
February 10th, 2009 at 11:52 am
I just put in E= mc sq as a comparison to your stand as “nothing can be made which is not preexsistent”. This theory does not go with theory of Maya. In Maya , Bhagavan can create any illusion. So I gave you teh story of Krishna and the Brahmin.
February 10th, 2009 at 11:56 am
I will talk to you later this week, about rest of the 3 answers.
February 10th, 2009 at 11:57 am
E= MC sq is the Einstein’s equation which shows that energy and matter are interconvertible.
February 10th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
“E= MC sq is the Einstein’s equation which shows that energy and matter are interconvertible.”
How is that connected to Hinduism?
February 10th, 2009 at 12:30 pm
Adam + Eve = Humans
i.e emmarcee equation
February 10th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
Amy. nice name. Sad if you have a mustache.
This is between Krishna and me. You may read his post first. I asked him about “first cause” and he gives me atheistic answers. Like – there is no creation. Things emerge from preexistent things. So it is not really connected to Hinduism. That is what I am exactly trying to point out.
February 10th, 2009 at 12:37 pm
E=MC sq
(Error = Muslims + Christens)
February 10th, 2009 at 12:42 pm
Does jaundiced person see everything yellow?
February 11th, 2009 at 3:33 am
Emmarcee,
>I just put in E= mc sq as a comparison to your stand as “nothing can be made which is not preexsistent”. This theory does not go with theory of Maya. In Maya , Bhagavan can create any illusion. So I gave you teh story of Krishna and the Brahmin.<
First let me clear main thing that there is no hindusim as you thing, Nothing like any hindusim, but its sanathandharma.
“nothing can be made which is not preexsistent”.
Let me put it little differently that everything made from the existing one.
Sanathana drama/veda/upanishad proclaim that the existence of Athaman/bramam is sathia vasthu the existence which is true but emmarcee and easwar feels that he is chiristian and i am hindu and . though this energy matter has come from same place still feels looking with differeces within them is maya. where is matter and where is energy when there is no diffence within this universe when an athman realise that the matter&engergy is same & still we feell with lot of differences which is just named as maya. When an athman realises that he his true vasthu and no differences is only perception and body, prana mind all is only difference but matter&energy is same. Untill you realaise this truth you and i will be under differences(which has other name maya)
February 11th, 2009 at 3:41 am
Deepak,
Found some more from a blog
http://hindustatement.wordpress.com/2009/02/04/the-etiquette-of-being-a-secular-indian/
There are etiquette’s for almost everything from talking on the phone to clearing your bladder at the toilet, so it is imperative that we have an etiquette to be a secular indian.
Here are a few and if incase you can add to these, please do so.
First and the foremost, if you see anything mentioning hinduism and hindu, automatically relate it to the rightwing hindutva brigand.Anything related to other religions is considered Secular.
If a group of goons threaten an author about bringing disrepute to anyother religion apart from Hinduism call them as “activists”, while goons threatening some one in the name of Hinduism call them “Hooligans”.
If a missionary forcefully converts some one to christianity call it as his/her fundamental right to propogate his religion. But if someone tries to “reconvert” them, call them well.you know… rightwing.
Make a hell of a noise about the “right wing” beating up girls in mangalore and dont even look at the episode about a pakistani student being beaten up in mumbai.
Make a fuss about a hindu marrying the second time when his wife is still alive but defend the constitutional right of a muslim man to marry more than once.
Never negate the aryan invasion theory even if you dont know what it is, and whether its right or wrong. Believe in it for the only reason that the “right wing” is against it.
Cry your heart out because muslims are not allowed into the mainstream, while any muslim who wanted to make it big in the main stream has done it without any kind of opposition from the majority.
Talk about the muslim presecution in the gaza strip, even of you dont know what Hamas did and are doing. Heck you need not even know where Israel and the gaza strip is.
Talk about gaza when you dont have a clue about what the kashmiri pandits are going through.
Relate every militant attack on the Kashmir issue while you are blissfully unaware of the ulterior motives of the militants.
Enter the words “Hindu Talibanisation” into your vocabulary, and use it when ever you can.
And yeah believe that Obama is the savior of the world and follow his every move, while you need not have a clue of who the vice president of india is.
February 11th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
Easwar/Krishna. Now we have turned a full circle, half way through the 6 questions. First you said there is no real God or creation, but it is just our mind creating Easwar. Now that I pointed out to you that this philosophy is Budhist, people claim that Budhism is some other type of Hindusim.
I will let a real Budhist scholar deal with you guys.
Check out:
http://www.byomakusuma.org/MadhyamikaBuddhismVisavisHinduVedanta/tabid/76/Default.aspx
February 11th, 2009 at 4:46 pm
“certainly certainly certainly:Punarabi jananey punarabi maraney
logic point:
when birth death is certain when death birth is certain . One cant distray anything also nothing cant be produced newly. what ever was there is there what ever is there will be there for ever may be form may change. Like timper visible after fire it burnt fully but the engergy of timper will be in other form sukshama. from point of god (consider god is merciful):
…………..
smooke: from smooke we can understand there must be fire ……se a mother has 4 boys all 4 different kind of kuna’s;
No.1 = when mother says something will adehere immd. do it atonce.No…………….there will be no dark of rebirth but light everywhere.
ohm=ohmen”
KRISHNA, NOW WE CAN COME TO NUMBER 4 , ABOUT THE JANMAS.
HERE ALSO, YOU GIVE 2 DIFFERENT ANSWERS, ONE WITH GOD PRESENT AND ONE WITHOUT.
Consider yourself a full Dedanti and advaitist. or even a Budhist for that matter. The theory is that the cycle of punarjanma should reach you closer to the paramatma. Or, it is given as a cause for the problems of the world. But , let me ask you. If everything is the product of Maya working on your Mana, who set the rules that you have to go through these Janmas? Who set the rules that some souls should go through the life of a bacteria or a menial labourer and another should be born as Brahmin? How was the first Brahmin created? what test did that soul go through to attain that position?
Who created Maya? I think the answer is creation of universe through Maya is “just that something the Parabrhaman does”. So is this parabrahma really a rule setter? It seems like he or she is. Are these rules someway corresponding to the Brahministic Dharmas? which is based on Varna system? Can’t we easily see that these Dharmas were written down for Brahmin’s own advantage?
On the other side, Budhist theory is so weak that it is disturbing. It goes like – our own mana is creating the entire universe. and there is no true Brahman – Anatma?Anatta. Realizing this gives you moksha?
Truth is that these metaphysical theories were created at a time when there was no other explanation about consciousness or intelligence. There was no clue as to what is actually making our body move. We have gone too far from that point to be entrapped in these type of philosophies. i am not saying that there is no element of Maya in universe. there could be. But it is not like you say, “when we close our eyes, the universe disappears”. No it does not. If you stand under a coconut tree, and try to make the universe by closing our eyes, we will be soon heading to hospital after a coconut hits your head!
So Maya of 6 th century (Sankara) may not be the Maya we might consider. To me, Maya, is just the lattice on which the seen and unseen universe is built on. To the people in this universe, or any material, there in no Maya, because we are all interacting. We go with common physical properties and rules. The creator, the First Cause whatever name you give him is beyond that.
Let me add one more thing here. We have gone beyond Big Bang also- this is for the friend who was touting Bing Bang for the validity of Advaita. (how did he connect it? I don’t know) – “Time” is just another dimension in the lattice. It being so, the whole concept of Janma cycle becomes kind of pointless. Isn’t it? The “Person/ parabrahma” whether enmeshed with the universe itself (as in Eastern metaphsyics) or a transcendental (spelling?) creator, should be able to see you even before you are born.
Finally after all beatings Christinity had to take, Science is still so perplexed as how the universe works. Nobody was able to rule out a “first Cause” for the Universe itself. Say, that this is just a matter of human mind working in the usual Cause -Effect manner.
NOW COMING TO YOUR QUESTION ABOUT PAPA AND HELL. We need to get to the bottom of christian theology. Jesus has sacrificed himself so we may have “eternal life” in his Kingdom. The problem is that there may be much more to it in realizing this scenario. There is no more Papa, to start with. It is equal opportunity for whoever accepts Jesus Sacrifice. I see Sin ?papa as a anythig that separates us from God, paramatma. So once we are in the presence of God, the people who discarded the saving grace of God, is on the other pole. This separation itself is naraka or eternal torure compared to eternal bliss.
Hence we pray, “help us from hearing your voice, “separate from me, I know you not”. It is a horrible, horrible thing. Worse than cancer, worse than death, because at the end of all our worldy sorrow, we have only one comfort, having his Grace/Kripa.
February 11th, 2009 at 5:18 pm
6. Is it your duty to save your own Dharma or is it your duty to help another human being even if it is against your Dharma?
You said yes. Yaek, wrong answer. AS per Hindu puranas, the Dharma should be the utmost and foremost principle. Remember Rama killing a Dalit boy who tried to learn Yoga vidya? See How mahabali went down to Pataal?
February 11th, 2009 at 10:27 pm
NAZI PHOTOS FOR THE WORLD TO SEE
http://nobeliefs.com/nazis.htm
A PICTURE IS WORTH THOUSAND WORDS, AND A MILLION PICTURES ARE WORTH you tell me.
February 12th, 2009 at 9:45 am
I am not debating with some jerk without sense (like Jesusturn), but only with Krishna. I have already showed you enough evidence to the true nature of Nazism, if have enough attention span to read a post. . If you think you can make some proof by showing some stupid pictures from an antiChristian site, just go on. Post it again and again. People who really don’t read may be convinced by “pictures”. It does not go into your moronic head that Germany is and was a catholic christian country who was taken over by Nazis, just like India is in danger of being taken over by Nazi RSS. We don’t blame all the Hindus of India. 80 percent are peace loving. But 20 percent of poison like you is enough to spoil the milk.
We wouldn’t blame or be alarmed if Indira visited Swamis or Rajiv went to Thirupathi. Even Obama clung on to the claim that he is a true Christian and took oath on a bible. This is part of the popular gimmick and politics. The decisions made by these people in their political life say more about them than their propaganda. It is not different with Hitler either. If he showed he is antichrisitian, do you think he would have got elected in Germany? This is the typical nature of antichrist people. They tend to deceive people in the beginning. Then show their true nature.
February 12th, 2009 at 10:06 am
Krishna,
I missed the answer on Miracle. You have conveniently tried to take a stab at Christians. yes, most Christians believe in a spiritdom and miracles. Mind it. Miracle is not magic. It is a full twisting of natural physical laws – walkin on water, making stomes float on water etc) . YOu go the atheistic way about it. YOu think that it is kind of our mind work. I think you kind of go to the extend of saying that even gods can be the figments of our imagination. I am not sure if we really understand and agree upon what Maya really is. Maya is not imagination. Maya is a true experience for most of us, unless God opens our eyes. For example even though we talk about Santa claus, we know that he does not exist. He si not Maya, he is imagination. Will you say same thing about your gods as well? Will you say all those miracles ascribed to your gods in Puranas and scriptures were just imagination? ( I think/beleive it was imagination, what I want to know is your stand about this, as a representative of Hinduism as practiced by a regular person).
February 12th, 2009 at 10:12 am
I think it is somewhat disgusting that Hindus have to take refuge in Atheism in order to save their grace many times. I think this is because they just want to use the antichristian thought propagated by western atheists. But if you truely beleive in non existence of god and creation, you will need to start apologizing to the mass of Hindus , common men and women who are directed to worship stone gods by your own all knowing swamis, sadhus , Brahmins and pundits. How come you did not stand up and tell them, guys this is foolishness, There is no god except in our imagination. We are all the part of the same Parabrahma, there is no need for untouchability. There is no need to fight Muslims. Everything is maya only. Rise above it. We did n’t do it, did we?
February 12th, 2009 at 10:46 am
:: somewhat disgusting
Do you know the meaning of DISGUST. This is.
http://www.truthbeknown.com/victims.htm
February 16th, 2009 at 12:29 pm
emmarcee,
No body sets any rule where is seting of rule when there is existence of Athman is pervaded allover. But its your the great egoself which makes your mind and creates according to your own will and wish. According to ones guna/pakkuva he takes his own rupa/boon.
There is no braministic dharma.
Who is bramin according to veda?
Sama vedam – Vajrasucika upnishad Shathi pada starts as ohm Abyaayanthu:
Let me try to explain the same what vajrasucika sama veda says.
This suthra/sasthra is the killer of agyana this will give gyan to those who are ignorance,
Bhraman,shathriya, vaicyar,and 4th varna. In this why braman is only more important :
It says that let us probe and Research over this issue
This reasearch analize all these parameters:
Jeeva,body,Jathi,gyan,Karma,Dharma
first its take jeevan as bramin: Jeevan is braman : its rejects that since jeevan is equal to all being and same jeevan takes many jenmas though it takes many rupa yet jeeva is same to all. Hence jeeva is not bramin
Theham(Body) : Lets research over body . is body bramin: No bcos for all being has got pacha pootha’s body all human bodies are similar, there is no different color for each varna’a it changes. Even when son burnt his father body after he dies he is not geting bramahathi thosha hence body is not bramana.
Jothi: Let us analis may be of jathi which is couse of braman : Maharishis have come from all varnas and even from all being also.
the whore son vashita is bramma rishi: The shathiriya Viswamithra is bramarishi, The valmiki is hunter,rishi rushya sringer is from deer.Rishi jambukar is come from jackle.Rishi vayas is son of fisher women. hence jothi is not couse for braman.
Lets tak of gyan arivu : this is also not correct reason is that there are more gyan from shathiri ,vaiciya and suthrira too.
Take karma: It is not so since every being has got prabtham,sincitham & agami which is general for all.
becos of dharmigan genorous) : Not at all reason is that including shathiriyas to all varna dharmigan only
Then who is braman: Who is not got duality and attain sachidan nandha nilai and has no difference of jathi,guna and donot have any kriya and who no thosha , Sathiyam,gyanam ,AAnadham & anadam swarupan, Also who has no vigalpa pawana but who is athara for all vigalpa bawana and the nirvigalpan is the base for all being who is inside and outside of all being like agash. this unbrakable aanadan cant catchable to mind,but for only to anubav this will be brighter abaraksham. Who ever got this muktha lakshanam is only bramin.
If any one against this lakshnam is not bramin is certainly not certainly not. dual less sachidanadha athama stage is important one has to attain this stage everyone has to attain this stage is lakshya.
This is what veda proclaim about braman: can say that this type of lakshan who ever got neverthless any jathi any one can become Vallar is got the same not a bramin Sokamilar is dalit,thukaram kuyavar,sopana is & recently kabeer is muslim who are braman. Now Amirthamayee is fisherwomen but braman. No body sets any rule here.
Ohm.
February 16th, 2009 at 12:50 pm
you will need to start apologizing to the mass of Hindus , common men and women who are directed to worship stone gods by your own all knowing swamis, sadhus , Brahmins and pundits. How come you did not stand up and tell them, guys this is foolishness,
Dont look with difference then you will have to see only with differeces. We Indian philosophy never educate atheistism but you will have to perceive as autheistical approach cos not able to accept it or undestand it. Its clearly says an athman is the exister rest is beemba prathi beemba. becouse of our agyan we could not realaize it since looking everything with differeces.
Stone god: Its again a scientifical approach of removing images. We the human/being mind is full of images/form only. We cant see/look/approach/think without image. To remove the image they created a best image where in all your mind process will have to be diverted towards the image god. Once the other images erraced and divireted towards god ..once images gone gyan( time/space theory will not be there)
February 16th, 2009 at 1:33 pm
Krish Easwar>>> Who is brahmin according to Veda?
Let me ask you the otherway… Who is Brahmin according to our Indian Hindu Society?.
Who are those matrimonial advt which calles from Brahmin Community Iyer/Iyengar? Are they living a saint life like Kabir? Who are those priests in Tirupathi/Puri/Sankaracharyas, and by what varna you call them?
February 16th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
emmarcee,
Maya is a true experience for most of us, unless God opens our eyes. For example even though we talk about Santa claus, we know that he does not exist. He si not Maya, he is imagination. Will you say same thing about your gods as well
Our philosophy denotes very clearly that unless untill dualism exists our mind can create everything posible. According to jeevan mind it keep change. I dont get dream as you see dream it same as opposite end also. same as matter and energy matter is your thoughts energy is what you reap of though. It will not deviate from your thoughts and your thoughts never go vain will become energy. Hence everything difference thing is possible by maya.
February 16th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
sapr
Who is bramin according to veda?
read vajrasuchika upanishad which is part of samaveda which denotes clearly please.
see my earlier post regarding this
February 16th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
Krishna Easwar>>>Maya is a true experience for most of us, unless God opens our eyes>>
If every thing can be attributed to Maya, then we loose the purpose/cause for our life.Even one can say, ‘Becoming Oneness with God’ itself could be an illusion or Maya. With this , life would become meaning less.
I can also rape/murder the other, and tell him, what he sees as rape is just a Maya..Whats hindu answer for this?
February 16th, 2009 at 6:28 pm
sapr
I can also rape/murder the other, and tell him, what he sees as rape is just a Maya..Whats hindu answer for this?
You can continue to do with your free will, no one stops but bear it in your mind that
Karma is not fate, for humans act with free will creating their own destiny. According to the Vedas, if we sow godness, we will reap goodness; if we sow evil, we will reap evil. Karma refers to the totality of our actions and their concomitant reactions in this and previous lives, all of which determines our future. The conquest of karma lies in intelligent action and dispassionate response.
Lastly, It divides karma into three kinds: Sanchith(accumulated), Prarabdha(fruit-bearing) and Kriyamana (current) karma. All kriyamana karmas become sanchita karma upon completion. From this stock of sanchita karma, a handful is taken out to serve one lifetime and this handful of actions, which has begun to bear fruit and which will be exhausted only on their fruit being enjoyed and not otherwise, is known as prarabdha karma. In this way, so long as the stock of sanchita karma lasts, a part of it continues to be taken out as prarabdha karma for being enjoyed in one lifetime, leading to the cycle of birth and death. A Jiva cannot attain moksha until the accumulated sanchita karmas are completely exhausted
Maya is a true experience for most of us, unless God opens our eyes>>
Since you and me keeps distance and divided from god due to lot of differences. The difference what you and i perceive is maya, unless start inquire to find the truth which is inside us untill such time eyes cant open. But if some one starts digging truth certainly will get help automatically from acharyan.
February 16th, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Easwar>>You can continue to do with your free will, no one stops but bear it in your mind that
Karma is not fate, for humans act with free will creating their own destiny>>
Please come clear on thsi point…Imagine this situation..I can go on raping other women, knowingly that I will be get raped in my next Karmic rebirth.And the cycle goes on endless and continued.
(1) So whats the purpose/cause for me in this life?
(2) Even hindu gods did the same, why shouldnt I? Cos im the same as God..
3) If so, why we need such god.. In my view, God is of absolute holiness, Righteousness and Justice. But here in Hinduism, god is also of the same like man, falling through Karma..
Please give me a convincing answer..
February 16th, 2009 at 7:06 pm
sapr,
Please come clear on thsi point…Imagine this situation..I can go on raping other women, knowingly that I will be get raped in my next Karmic rebirth.And the cycle goes on endless and continued.
hope you assume that if you keep rape this janma next janma same wil happen and keeps go which may endless this is wat your question.
Dont assume if you do a crime pilfering for doing of
burglary judge will not ask some one to do the same in your home, but he puts you for 5 year jail imprisonment. Its for you to realiase yourself he gives you time, its not punishment but a boon to relaise your goodself.
sorry to say Your question of asking this way is feel juvenile.
every mother wants his boys to go up not down. some time she will beat /heat in wards but not to wound his childran to make a good one.
Hope you are mature hence not expecting juvenile question atleast about god(true god )
But here in Hinduism, god is also of the same like man, falling through Karma..
Correct all image till lord suriya to indra to brama fall under karma category .. They also need self realaisation they will also come under space/time. One who attains true existence athma gyan till dualism will continue. or other ward
untill dualism there there must be no gyan or athmanubuthy.
Ohm=ohmen
February 19th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Easwar>>>But here in Hinduism, god is also of the same like man, falling through Karma..>>
Good, finally you agreed gods of hinduism do sin, and falls through Karma.
In Christian tradition, God is viewed as Absolute Holiness, Absolute Righteousness and Absolute Justice. Contrarily, gods of hinduism is just like any other man falls through sin, repays by Karma.. In such case, why we need a god? Whats the role of keeping him as god. Why we need to do such a god, who himself has gone through sin and karma?
There must be some reasons right!!
22) one can go on raping and murdering without getting caught in the police. Debauchery!!!. Whoom are we accountable for this?
February 19th, 2009 at 11:00 am
Sapr.
In Christian tradition, God is viewed as Absolute Holiness, Absolute Righteousness and Absolute Justice. Contrarily, gods of Hinduism is just like any other man falls through sin, repays by Karma.. In such case, why we need a god? Whats the role of keeping him as god. Why we need to do such a god, who himself has gone through sin and karma?
There must be some reasons right!!
My dear sapr one have to respect everything in the universe. If you work in a company as an officer and you have to report to regional manager but there is chairmen who is head of your company. Can you ignore athikari’s officers manager,gm,vp, president…who are between chairmen. But certainly you can become a president provided your attitude is good.
In the world any country you see, there will be govt official body, political layer and top most is president of the nation. Though president yet he is also bind to constitution & law of the nation. But there is no bind for law becouse its truth will not change. India understands the world theory and will go according to nature theory.
Indian discovery is only all world are taking, in other world religions would have emerge after indian way of life.. when the whole world is dark but india brighten even 5000 years back also. The mother of all language and culture is india which is agreed by all nation. So india knows that the god is absolute righteousness.
But religions did not understand what is absolute. as per western approach (you) they are not able to difine what is absolute? men..women..both,,animal..fire…water… but it says that god has made human like him. It reveals that god is a human and men….How come they claim that a person who is different from mahath is absolute. How can you claim an absolute mere man who sits in chair when he gives final judgment? why he requires chair and where he sits and how many years. When you say vasthu you have to define which will come under vikalpat/parinamati/vikara is not be absolute. And when you claim righteousness how can you say when you are not able to give absolute righteousness for animal,creature etc,, and also to whom or ignorance?
Unless inquire /understand real spiritual knowledge cant realiase the truth..just saying claiming will not fetch anything is called ignorance but vivekey inquire will reach
providence
June 10th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
Excellent blog with lots of useful information. Are there any forums that you recommend I join?
June 11th, 2009 at 7:09 pm
Sandra dee,
this is excellent blog, though there are few chiristian fanatics, who always abuse of our dharm yet they are also good knowledged people sapr&emmarcee.
August 20th, 2009 at 11:51 am
Sapr, emmarcee,
where did you go, without saying anything, ur all question being answered, since you keep mum, i assumed that you agree & understand true
April 4th, 2010 at 2:31 am
I am not new to blogging and truly value your site. There is much special subject that peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your internet site and keep checking you out.
August 6th, 2010 at 4:46 pm
Hi all,
This is interesting news. I have been watching the major news channels for some time now and they all seen to be anti Hindu in their reporting. Is there some way the Prasar Bharati can be nudged from its sleep into correcting this stance. These channels fight bitterly when attacked but do not desist from using terms like “Hindu Terror”. Why don’t they share that with other religions like “Islamic Terror” or “Christian Racism”. After all the constitution says – treat everybody equally. Why this bias against Hindus. Such activities will force even the most peaceful of Hindus to support fanatics later. This tendency should be checked. But unfortunately the honorable courts are silent on this. Why?
I welcome counter points or suggestions. Thank you for your patience.