Innocent until proved guilty.  That’s common place.  However, for the Indian media specialising in harassing Hindus, it is guilty until proved innocent.  Pragya Thakur does not have anything to do with so-called Hindu terrorism except that her scooter (which she sold years ago) was used for the explosion.  The police also claim mobile phone conversations between her and the actual culprit.  However, these things are not admissible by law considering the fabrications.  If that was the case, Salman Khan should have been behind bars for his conversation with the underworld dons.  She is bound to be acquitted of the charges.  However, that will take time considering the slow pace of the Indian Courts.  That gives time for the media communalists to brand Hindus as “Terrorists”.

Now many are rallying behind Sadhvi Pragya.  She is unjustly accused of “Hindu Terrorism” while the Ajmal Kasabs are being fed biriyanis.  She has been administered narcotics which is usually reserved for hardcore criminals.  Now why are not the Left Feminists crying hoarse about injustice to women?

Anyway, Baba Ramdev and Thackerray have openly come out in support of Sadhvi Pragya.  Read them here.  The BJP chief Rajnath Singh has also blamed the communal UPA Maharashtra Government for harassing Pragya.

Read the below links to find out how Pragya has been tortured in custody and how Hindus are now coming out in support, especially after the charges against her have proved empty and hollow.

http://www.indianexpress.com/news/pragya-thakur-you-march-ahead-were-with-y/386829/

http://www.zeenews.com/nation/2008-11-11/482546news.html

http://www.rediff.com/news/2008/nov/01malegaon.htm

http://specials.rediff.com/news/2008/nov/04sld1.htm

Sadhvi alleges torture in Police Custody

Courtesy: Daily Pioneer (2008)

Maintaining that she was “totally innocent” of the charges made against her in connection with the Malegaon blasts, Sadhvi Pragya on Monday alleged that the Anti Terrorist Squad (ATS) officials had tortured her and mentally harassed her to such an extent that she wanted to commit suicide at one stage while she was in their “illegal” detention.

On a day when the Nashik court extended the judicial custody of eight accused in the Malegaon blasts, including herself, till November 29, Sadhvi Pragya filed before the court an eight-page affidavit, in which she gave the details of the manner in which she was tortured while she was under “illegal detention” of the ATS.

In her affidavit, Sadhvi Pragya alleged that on October 12, 2008, 11 days before she was formally arrested, an ATS officer named Khanvilkar had beaten her up “severely with a belt on my hands, forearms, palms, feet, soles, causing me bruises, swelling and contusions in these areas”.

Stating that she had been illegally detained between October 10 and 22, 2008 during which she was tortured and mentally harassed, Sadhvi Pragya said: “I was physically and verbally traumatised to the extent that I wanted to commit suicide”.

Sadhvi Pragya went on to demand a detailed inquiry into her illegal detention and custodial torture. “……a detailed inquiry of my illegal detention, custodial torture, etc. needs to be done and for which I am ready and willing to get subjected to any such medical test or tests and I also want the ATS officers, who interrogated me, tortured me, etc. should also be put to the same tests,” she said.

She also alleged that she was denied access to a lawyer or any member of her family till October 24, 2008, nearly a fortnight after she was detained by the ATS in connection with the Malegaon blasts.

Sadhvi Pragya claimed that three narco tests had been conducted on her – one while she was in “illegal detention” prior to October 23, 2008, second on November 1 and a third narco test was conducted on her before she was produced before the court on November 3, 2008.

In her defence, Sadhvi Pragya said in her affidavit: “I unambiguously state that I am totally innocent of any offence whatsoever. In particular I have no connection with the Malegaon bomb blast of 29.9.2008″.

On the use of an LML Freedom two-wheeler owned by her in the Malegaon blasts, Sadhvi Pragya told the court in her affidavit: “I say that in Surat during the course of my interrogation with Sawant, I mentioned to him that the LML Freedom two-wheeler once owned by me was subsequently sold to one Sunil Joshi of Madhya Pradesh way back in October 2004 and that Joshi had paid me Rs 24,000 for the same. I had also signed the necessary T.T. Form for RTO transfer in October 2004 itself.

I categorically asserted to Sawant that since October 2004 I had no control over the vehicle or its movements and usage”.

Sadhvi Pragya, who signed the affidavit prepared by her lawyers after the latter translated the contents of the English affidavit in Hindi, alleged that the ATS’ conduct “discloses a blatant violation of statutory provisions of law, custodial abuse and violence, mental and physical torture and prolonged illegal detention”.

Charging that she was being victimised owing to political reasons, Sadhvi Pragya said: “The ATS are fully aware that I am innocent.

It appears, however, that they have a mandate from their political superiors to necessarily implicate me in Malegaon blasts with a view to suggest that Hindu religious extremists were resorting to terrorism. The prolonged illegal detention, custodial abuse and physical torture were designed to compel me to confess to crimes I had not committed”.

Sadhvi Pragya also offered to subject herself to a detailed investigation, including a narco test, for the allegations she has made against the ATS in her affidavit. She also urged the court to call for a report from the ATS for her admission to two hospitals and the treatment she had undergone in two hospitals and also the reasons for her stay at Hotel Rajdoot in Mumbai.