The following are the antics of the great Indian media which delights in raping news to suit its own end:

1. Always blame Hindus for communal violence ignoring the mass of evidence against Islamic and Christian perpetrators.

2. During communal violence, don’t send your cameras to the scene of minority violence, focus the archlight on majority violence only (read Modi and Bajrang Dal).

3. When Hindus react, give them generous advice like preserving peace and brotherhood — Two wrongs do not make a right.

4. When Muslims attack for any flimsy reason, give a direct apology as in the case of Muslim attack on Hindu and Deccan Herald.

5. Project the Hindu Gurus in a bad light and project them like villains even when there is not even a shred of evidence against them — Read the Shankaracharya.

6. Ignore the criminal charges against priests and missionaries - Read Graham Staines and the Church.

7. Ridicule Hindu emotions as superstitions while project the same superstitions as personal faith when it comes to the minorities.

8. Rave over Islamic superstars like Aamir Khan and Shahruk Khan while going low on Hindu heroes like Akshay Kumar and Hrithik Roshan.

9. Always make it a point to undermine all that which makes Hindus proud of Indian tradition.

10. Make it a point to throw the spotlight on dark side of Hinduism only like caste, sati, untouchability et al.

There are more.  Do point it out to me.  My next book is on Exposing Indian Media and its anti-Hindu bias.

In my opinion, Sri Sri tops the list for he made a difference to the way the world perceives Hinduism. 

This is what Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki said about Sri Sri,  ”There are big powers which have big might, but they are not able to unite the hearts and minds of people. This work can be done only by a spiritual leader.” 

 1. Sri Sri Ravishankar: He serves as a living example for dedication to humanitarian causes.  Sri Sri is only to be seen to be believed. I liked his vision spelled out in his official website : “My Vision is a Violence-free, stress-free world“.  Also his words bring great insight:  ”Technology without spirituality is destructive. Spirituality is the technology of consciousness, and the whole world is the play and display of consciousness. ” Read the complete discourse here. http://www.srisri.org/teachings.html.  Besides, he also applied the healing balm on caste equations by demanding an immediate ban on entry-restrictions to Dalit.  According to Sri Sri, there should be only three classes — Brahmin (the learned), Kshatriya (Administrators) and Vaishyas (the business class). The last class (Shudras) should be eliiminated through technology as it has happened in the west.  Sri Sri has promoted Patanjali Yoga Sutras and other Hindu scriptures by presenting them in contemporary lights.  No doubt, he is at the top of my list.  Overall, Sri Sri is an amalgamation of modern thoughts with ancient wisdom.  However, I do have differences with Sri Sri in some scores like his attempts at being politically correct.  His dialogue with Zakir (Zoker) Naik was a disaster.  His attempts at bridging Hindus and Muslims was an outright flop.  His refusal to see Islam as a terror ideology surprised me although I feel he knows the Truth but is reluctant to admit it in public for reasons best known to him.  The best thing about Sri Sri is the way he handles the anti-Hindu media with his mischeavous one-liners.

2. Sonal Shah: Frankly, I don’t know much about Sonal Shah.  I have never met this young lady nor have I read much about her.  But she has managed hi-profile jobs as the CSR chief of Google and was handpicked by the US Prez for overseeing the transition of Presidency.  The anti-Hindu media made a lot of fuss about her selection.  But then, this young lady must have deserved it considering her family links to Sangh Parivar — which is the favourite whipping boy of the anti-Hindu media. 

3. Ratan Tata: Ratan is the head of a global conglomerate.   Of course, there are the Ambanis who are greater than him considering their financial muscle.  But the Tatas have a tradition of society orientedness long before CSR (Corporate Social Resonsibility) became an in-thing in biz-jargons.  His composure during the Mumbai terror attacks and his ethical business practices in this Kali-age is really admirable. You might say that he is a Parsi.  But he is a Hindu in my definition of a way of life where you follow your own faith without troubling others.

4. Narendra Modi: The poster boy of HIndutva is always there. Despite being a target of the virulent malicious propaganda, he has managed to win three elections and has silenced all his critics through his deft administration.  Though the US has refused him visa, he remains a ray of hope for the Hindus who are fed up with anti-Hindu propaganda.

5. Baba Ramdev: There is only one Superman in India and he is Baba Ramdev.  And there is only one Superwoman in India and she is Madame Pasta Ben.  One is pro-Hindu and the other is anti-Hindu. Baba Ramdev leads from the front and assures us that the great Hindu way of life is not just alive but kicking.

6. Amrutananda Mayi: This hugging Saint does not know English or any other language.  She knows only Malayalam.  She also does not have a photogenic face or the usual charisma exuded by the celebrities.  Despite this, she is at the top of the Guru Chart.  She is a real mystery.  I have seen her in action several times.  If not for Amrutananda Mayi, the Commies in Kerala would have destroyed God’s own land.  She is the only rape of hope for Communist Kerala.  A pity, Bengal does not have one.  As for the anti-Hindu media, it refuses to project her and raised a storm in the tea cup when some frustrated person tried to stab her and was caught.

7. Sadhwi Pragya: The media and the UPA-backed Maharashtra Government tried their best to project her as a Hindu terrorist.  She was given the dope test in gross violation of the codes and yet the anti-Hindu media as well as human rightwallahs didn’t even raise a whimper.  It seems as if their voice is heard only when defending terrorists’ rights.  Sadhwi Pragya is a post-graduate in Political Science and is a fiery speaker when it comes to Hindutva.  She is certain to come out unscathed in the case. Personally, I will support the Sadhvi even if she is convicted because I like many other HIndus are in favour of Reverse Terrorism especially when the inept UPA Government is not in favour of strigent laws like POTA when it comes to controlling Islamic terror.

8. Sadhvi Rithambara: Her voice was the power behind the Ayodhya historical corrective but it has now mellowed with age.  But her commitment has not.  Her attempts at rehabilitation destitute Hindu women is the stuff legends are made of.  As usual, our negative media can never project a positive woman like her in a good light. 

9. Anonymous Swayamsewaks: They are there in the background and most of them pass their life in anonymity and several in ignominy.  But they are the real soldiers who kept aloft the flag of Hinduism high.  They are like the common Bhils who never let Rana Pratap down even when odds were stacked against him.

10. The Resurgent Hindu intellectuals: Here I think I have to pat my own back.  There are a lot of Hindu intellectuals today.  There are giants like V S Naipaul and Arun Shourie.  Then there are the anonymous pen pushers too.  They have taken on the ubiqutous mainstream media and are all set to win the battle for just one simple reason — because TRUTH is on their side.

This time, the missionaries have received record foreign funds for pimping their intolerant Semitic faith.

The top 15 donor agencies are as follows and as usual, they too are Christian-related NGOs.

 The top 15 recipients of foreign fundings are as follows:  Again most of them who received foreign fundings were Christian missionaries.

It may be noticed that with Sonia’s remote control at the Centre, the missionaries have been emboldened to carry on their conversion activities.  In Mangalore, the prevailing rates for conversions were Rs. 50,000 and a house to stay.  Plus, they were denigrating Hindu gods which led to Hindu-Christian riots in the region.

The Christian fundings must be thoroughly probed taking into account the missionary mischief.  It must be recalled that Europe ditched medieval Christianity post-renaissance.  The Missionaries are eyeing India because they find cheap labour in India. Most of the Churches in Europe and US are running to empty houses and the only way to increase the Christian masses is to take advantage of Indian poverty.  That explains why lots of funds are coming in for the purpose.

See this report on the latest incoming foreign funds here: www.mha.gov.in/fcra/annual/ar2006-07.pdf

Also read this link from TOI: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Foreign_funds_to_Indian_NGOs_soar_Pak_among_donors/rssarticleshow/3882898.cms

Here is an article based on 2005-06 report:
http://www.sanghparivar.org/blog/sjain/hpi-christian-institutions-top-list-of-ngos-operating-in-india-in-2007

The right way to end totalitarianism?

Koran is nothing but a terror manual.  Anybody following it to the T becomes a terrorist by default.

I could not help laughing when I saw the way several dignitaries condemned the terrorist activities in Mumbai.  The NHRC chief while condemning the incident said that terrorists do not have any religion and that this act should should be condemned by all.

This is a great irony.  Terrorists do have a religion.  And it is Islam.  Take the names of the terrorists.  They are all Muslims brainwashed by a terror manual called Koran.

Koran is nothing but a terror manual.  it’s aim is to create Dar-ul-Islam — where the entire world is full of Muslims and nothing but Muslims.  How does one achieve that?

The Koran tells the faithful to kill the infidels wherever you find them.  The Koran tells the faithful to strike terror into the hearts of the infidels.  That is what these terrorists are doing.  Striking terror. And when they are doing so, they are just following the Koran.

So don’t say terrorists don’t have a religion.  These terrorists are just ordinary human beings like us who are brainwashed by a terror manual called Koran.  So this Koran should be banned in the first place because it provokes jehad.  And Jehad is nothing but killing the men and taking the women.

This is what the Jehadis have done all along.  And this is what they will continue to do unless we put an end to the terror manual called Koran and the Hadiths.

By the way, many Hindus were happy that the ATS chief was killed in the encounter.  Because he was the one who allegedly tortured Sadhvi Pragya at Congress behest.  He was the one who threatened to kill Col. Purohit in an encounter although many of his friends say that he refused to succumb to Congress pressure to fabricate evidence against the Sadhvi.  I am not very sure about it.

However, one thing is sure.  Now nobody will preach pseudosecularism to us Hindus since the targets were foreigners.  Remember, the colonial pseudosecular mind has an inferiority complex when it comes to white skin.

Tailpiece: The Bihari bufallo Lalu Prasad Yadav has blamed Modi and Advani for Mumbai terror. But this buffalo is a darling of our pseudosecular media because he arrested Advani during the Ratha Yatra. The Indian media has a great buffoon for company.

Following are some instances in which the papacy admitted errors or apologised for actions of the Roman Catholic Church.   If he can do so for trivial causes,  why can’t he do so for the heinous murder of Swami Lakshmanananda in Kandhmal

Dogma 1). “Does the VHP have the right to speak for you or I?”

Reality: Yeah, VHP has done a lot of service to Hindu activities unlike armchair intellectuals like you. They have gone deep into the forests and have saved a number of Hindus from the proselytising arms of Islam and Christianity. If Swami Vivekananda and Mahatma Gandhi were alive, they would have been proud of VHP. By the way, what have you done for Hinduism, Mr. Thapar, why should you have the right to speak for you or I?

Dogma 2. Do they reflect our views? Do we endorse their behaviour? They call themselves the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, but who says they represent all of us?”
Reality: They represent authentic Hindus and not pseudosecular Hindus like you.

Dogma 3. “This Sunday morning, I want to draw a clear line of distinction between them and everyone else. My hunch is many of you will agree.”

Reality: So you want to divide Hinduism. I don’t agree with you. I agree with VHP which wants to unite Hindus. So what is your problem.

Dogma 4. “Let me start with the question of conversion - an issue that greatly exercises the VHP”
Reality: It greatly exercised not just the VHP. It also greatly exercised one Mahatma Gandhi and one Swami Vivekananda. It also greatly exercises the common Hindus.

Dogma 5. “I imagine there are hundreds of millions of Hindus who are peaceful, tolerant, devoted to their faith, but above all, happy to live alongside Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains and Jews.”
Reality: Now I have to agree with you. You are imagining things. The history of Islam and Christianity is soaked in blood. The American historian Will Durant described Mohammedan conquest of India as the bloodiest story in the history of mankind. No Hindu is happy to live alongside Muslims. Why don’t you move over to Taliban, Regarding Christian atrocities, you would do well to read Bertrand Russell, Mr. Thapar. Besides, Sikhs and Buddhists are a part of the greater Hindu Samaj. Your pseudosecular moves at dividing Hindu society does not impress anyone.

Dogma 6. “If any one of us were to change our faith how does it affect the next man or woman? ”
Reality: Great. Now our progressive Karan Thapar is supporting medieval Christianity and Islam. And he has now proved himself to be a greater fool. Well, Christianity and Islam are medieval faiths and converting to these faiths not just makes us one man less but one enemy more. Remember, Hindus are Kafirs in Islamic parlance and heathens in Christian parlance. So Islam and Christianity are intolerant faiths and they just cannot tolerate the idolator Hindu. If you don’t understand such a simple logic, you are unfit to call yourself an intellectual, Mr. Thapar. I will now quote Thomas Jefferson, the former US President “Millions of innocent men, women and children, since the introduction of Christianity, have been burnt, tortured, fined, imprisoned; yet we have not advanced an inch towards uniformity. …were the Pope, or his allies, to send in mission to us some thousands of Jesuit priests to convert us to their orthodoxy, I suspect that we should deem and treat it as a national aggression on our peace and faith.”

Dogma 7. “And even if that happens with inducements, it can only prove that the forsaken faith had a tenuous and shallow hold.” “So why do the VHP and its unruly storm troopers, the Bajrang Dal, froth at the mouth if you, I or our neighbours convert? What is it to do with them? Let me put it bluntly, even crudely. If I want to sell my soul - and trade in my present gods for a new lot - why shouldn”t I? ”
Reality: Well, Mr. Thapar, authentic Hindus are not cheap like you. They value their soul and don’t sell it. So when the Islamists/Christians try to dupe our innocent brothers with allurements, we are bound to stop them from getting denationalised. Surely, we don’t want ISI agents and FBI agents in our neighbourhood. Besides, Hinduism is a noble way of life and not a killer-cult like Islam and Christianity. We are proud of our tolerant faith unlike you who seems to be paid by medieval cultists.

Dogma 8. “Even if the act diminishes me in your eyes, it”s my right to do so. So if thousands or even millions of Dalits, who have been despised and ostracized for generations, choose to become Christian, Buddhist or Muslim, either to escape the discrimination of their Hindu faith or because some other has lured them with food and cash, it”s their right. ”
Reality: If you can support conversion, you should also support prostitution. A prostitute sells her body for cash, a converter sells his soul (I am sure you don’t have one, Mr.Thapar). Or else, you would not write so cheap. Regarding poverty among Dalits, I would like to tell you that poverty is a hang-over of Islamic-British-Nehruvian rule in India. They impoverished the entire Hindu soceity during their rule. And cheap intellectuals like you have the temerity to abuse Hindu faith while it is a historic fact that Muslims, Christians, Colonialists and Communists have been responsible for nation’s poverty.

Dogma 9: “Arguably you may believe you should ask them to reconsider, although I would call that interference but you certainly have no duty or right to stop them. In fact, I doubt if you are morally correct in even seeking to place obstacles in their way. The so-called Freedom of Religion Acts, which aim to do just that, are, in fact, tantamount to obstruction of conversion laws and therefore, at the very least, questionable.”
Reality: Mr. Thapar, you want the Hindus to be sitting duck to Christian/Islamic poachers. No way, get out of your dream land. We did not bend during the past 1,000 years of Islamic/Colonialist/Christian/Socialist rule. Nor will we bend in future. We have something called as self-respect which you seem to have sold somewhere down the line.

Dogma 10: “However, what”s even worse is how the VHP responds to this matter. Periodically they resort to violence including outright murder”
Reality: When compared to Islam/Christian violence in India, the VHP violence is a damp squib.

Dogma 11: What happened to Graham Staines in Orissa was not unique”
Reality: Staines was a cheap missionary who abused Hindu Gods. The masses gave him a fitting tribute for his action. That’s all. Staines had criminal record back home in Australia. He had cases against him registered by the Orissa police. He had a handgun with him during the time of his killing. Of course, the pseudosecular media did not report this because a white man’s life is more dear than a brown man’s life. Is it not?
Dogma 12: Last week it happened again. Apart from the utter and contemptible criminality of such behavior, is this how we Hindus wish to behave? Is this how we want our faith defended? Is this how we want to be seen? I have no doubt the answer is no. An unequivocal, unchanging and ever-lasting NO!”
Well, the Christians started it through their aggressive proselytisation and the killing of Lakshmananda. So educate yourself, Mr. Thapar.

Dogma 13: The only problem is it can”t be heard. And it needs to be. I therefore believe the time has come for the silent majority of Hindus - both those who ardently practice their faith as well as those who were born into it but may not be overtly religious or devout - to speak out.”

Reality: Yes, the time has come for the ordinary Hindus to speak against pseudosecularists in Indian media like you. You people have sold your soul to the west and are very keen on ditching Hindus and Hinduism. You only speak against Gujarat riots while ignoring Godhra. You only speak out against Hindu violence while ignoring Islamic/Christian/Communist genocides. The common Hindus should kick pseudosecularists like you. The time has come for that.

Dogma 14: “Indeed, they do not defend but shame Hinduism. That”s my central point.”

Reality: Shame. What kind of shame? Didn’t you feel ashamed when the Government twiddled its thumbs during jehadi attacks? Didn’t you feel ashamed when terrorists backed by Christians are running amok in North-East? Didn’t you feel ashamed when 3 lakh Kashmir Pandits were driven out of Kashmir? Why is your shame restricted to a few stray Hindu attacks? Why don’t you direct your shame to worthy issues?
Dogma 15: I”m sorry but when I read that the VHP has ransacked and killed I”m not just embarrassed, I feel ashamed. Never of being hindu but of what some Hindus do in our shared faith”s name.”
Reality: So, you felt happy when 3 lakh Kashmir Pandits were driven out of Kashmir. You felt happy when 58 Hindus were killed in Godhra. Why is your “Sorry” selective?

Dogma 16: “This is why it”s incumbent on Naveen Patnaik, Orissa”s Chief Minister, to take tough, unremitting action against the VHP and its junior wing, the Bajrang Dal.”
Reality: Why don’t you demand strict action against those anti-national proselytisers? Sure, you don’t have the balls to demand action against the violent minorities.
Dogma 17: This is a test not just of his governance, but of his character. And I know and accept this could affect his political survival. But when it”s a struggle between your commitment to your principles and your political convenience is there room for choice? For ordinary politicians, possibly, but for the Naveen I know, very definitely not. So let me end by saying: I”m waiting, Naveen. In fact, I want to say I”m not alone. There are hundreds of millions of Hindus, like you and me, waiting silently - but increasingly impatiently. Please act for all of us.”
Reality: So now you are trying to emotionally blackmail Naveen Patnaik. Well, I would like to say that 100s of millions of Hindus are with Bajrang Dal and VHP. They are supporters of masculine Hinduism and have rejected the namby-pamby pseudosecularism that Karan Thapar endorses.

Finally, an advice to Karan Thapar:

Grow up Soon. You are full of grey hair. Unfortunately, you stop short of wisdom.

These days I meet several Hindus who say that they don’t endorse violence in the name of Hinduism. I respect their views… but I will never talk to them because I believe in masculine Hinduism.

Soft, wishy-washy, namby-pamby Hinduism does not work all the time. At a time when Hinduism is reeling under jehadi terrorism, evangelical manipulations, global machinations and intellectual terrorism of NDTV-CNN combine, we need masculine Hinduism.

Who are the mascots of masculine Hinduism.  Undoubtedly, it is Swami Vivekananda for the modern times whom I consider as the father of modern Hindu nationalism.  Then for old-timers, we have Rana Pratap, Shivaji, Ranjeet Singh who made Muslims bend on their knees during a time when Islamic terrorism ruled the roost.  And then there is my favourite Chandrashekar Azad who sent a chill down the British spine even when the odds were against him.

As a masculine Hindu, I still believe in the age-old wisdom of Upanishad — Ahimsa Paramodharmaha (Non-violence is the greatest virtue).  However, non-violence does not mean being a sitting duck to Islamic-Christian-Left-intellectual terrorists.  Self-preservation (Atma Rakshan) is also our greatest dharma.

There is absolutely nothing wrong in striking at the base of terror.  There is nothing wrong in defending yourself.  There is nothing wrong in a good fight.

That is why I support Narendra Modi and his ilk.  May their tribe increase.  And I wish that those who fight for terrorist rights also spare a thought for Hindu victims who are not in the media glare.

I may sound old-fashioned.  But if truth is old-fashioned, it is not my fault.

 Urvashi is not a prostitute.  She is a celestial nymph.  Secondly Vasistha was one of the Saptarishis (Seven Great Sages Rishi) in the seventh, i.e the present Manvantara,^[1] and the Rajpurohit / Rajguru of the Suryavamsha or Solar Dynasty. He was the manasaputra of Brahma. He had in his possession the divine cow Kamadhenu, and Nandini her child, who could grant anything to their owners.

Vashisht is credited as the chief author of Mandala 7 of the Rigveda. Vashisht and his family are glorified in RV 7.33, extolling their role in the Battle of the Ten Kings, making him the only mortal besides Bhavayavya to have a Rigvedic hymn dedicated to him. Another immortal treatise dedicated by him to the humanity is “Vashisht Samhita” - a book on Vedic system of electional astrology (Muhurtha/ Muhurt)- based on which theory & principles of electional astrology have emanated & followed through millenniums & which have withstood test of the time.

 Abuse no. 2: When Krishna himself is wallowing in darkness of hell, how can he enlighten others?  Since  Krishna himself is a shady character, there is a need for us to  liberate his misled followers. (page 50)

Lord Krishna is considerd as an Avatar in Hindu pantheon.  He  is supposed to have lived around 5,200 years ago.  Accordingly, he is supposed to reincarnate whenever adharma increases.  There is no reference anywhere  which says that he is in  hell.  I wonder, what divine wisdom the missionaries have when they can see somebody wallowing in hell.

Abuse no. 3: t was Brahma himself who kidnapped Sita.  Since Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva were themselves the victims of lust, it is a sin to consider them as Gods. (page 39)

 First of all, Ramayana can be interpreted anyway you want.  In fact, the world is a divine illusion.  Secondly, creation needs lust.  Even the divine missionaries are a product  of lust. Everyone has doubts about immaculate conception.  I wonder how Jesus was born without pregnancy.  It is all fancy stuff.  Is it not?

Abuse No. 4: When the Trinity of Hinduism (Brahma, Vishnu and Shiva) are consumed by lust and anger, how can they liberate others.  Their projection as Gods is nothing but a joke. (page 39).

Hinduism is not a single prophet/single book cult like Islam and Christianity.  There are 84 schools of thoughts in Hinduism – of  which even atheism is a part.  Then there are other concepts like duality, non-duality and achintabheda tattwa (where the soul is neither dual nor non-dual).  In Hinduism, worship and liberation is a personal affair.  Nobody has the right to interefere in other’s mode of worship.  There is something called as Vyakti Dharma.  It is highly personal.  No conversions and interference please.

Abuse No.5:  Vishnu asked Brahma to commit a sin, he immediately did so.  How can such a “evil brahma” be a Creator of this Universe?  How is it possible for both the sinner and the entity which provoked the sin to be gods?  (page 39)

 First of all, there is no sin and no sinner.  Sin is a Christian concept.  Majority of Hindus consider the universe as leela (divine play). Though there are other variations too, most  of the Hindus have pantheistic overtones.  They don’t differentiate between the creator and the creation.  Most of the Hindus are believers in oneness and pantheism.  Note, it is not monotheism of the zealous semitic Gods.

Abuse No. 6: God, please liberate the sinful people of India who are worshipping False Gods  that believe in the pleasures of  illicit ‘Vyabichari’ relationships. (Page 39).

 Swami Vivekananda described the people of India as children of immortality.  (Amritasya Putraha).  These are the lines from the Upanishads.  The soul is  not a sinner.  It is a spark of the universal divinity.  So there is no question of liberating sinners because sin does not exist in the first place.  As for the so called “Vyabichar”, it is simple logic to say that the world would stop without sex.  Sex is nothing but nature’s mechanism to ensure that individuals reproduce.  In fact, we have a deity for sex (Kamadeva or Cupid) in Hinduism.  Per se, sex  is natural.  However, Victorian sensibilities ensure that a lot of guilt is  associated with it.

THE OUTCOME OF HINDU-CHRISTIAN NEGOTIATION IN MANGALORE

Christian leaders and Hindu leaders held a meeting to thrash out the differences at The Circuit House in Mangalore.

The Hindu delegation consisted of Prof M B Puranik, Vibhag Sanghachallak and VHP district President, Dr. Prabhakar Bhat, Prant Karyavaya, Dr. Madhav Bhandary, Vibhaga Karyakarini Sadasya, Monappa Bhandary, district BJP President, Shrikar Prabhu, Jagadish Shenava, Rajagopala Rai.  The Christian delegation was led by Fr. J B Crasta, Louis Pinto,Felix Alberque, M P Noronha, William D’Souza, Stany Alvares.

The negotiation was held under the supervision of district in-charge Minister Shri Krishna Palemar.  The persons who mediated towards bringing both sides together were Dharmaraj, Mangalore-based-builder and  S Ramesh, Social worker.

The Hindu delegation put forth its view stating that

1. Hindu society was never aggressive and in fact encouraged and promoted plurality in society. 
2. Christianity grew because of Hindu patronage
3. Christians were denigrating Hindu faith through distribution of pamphlets denigrating Hindu God. (Satya Darshini pamphlet distributed by New Life says that Hindu gods were promiscuous and wallowing in darkness  of hell).
4. Christians were objecting to Hindu articles of faith like Rakhi, bindi, flowers et al
5. Christians used the children of Hindu parents when the institutions were protesting against Kandmal violence
6. The Christians in Mangalore had even protested when Jayalalitha Government had banned conversion in Tamil Nadu
7. They had even pelted stones and had injured policemen who were trying to protect law and order.
8. Though the Christian delegation was distancing itself from New Life, they were in fact supporting it by protesting in a big way as if to condone the New Life activities.
9. The Schools run by Christians were psychologically dominating Hindu school children as if to give a bad impression about the Hindu faith.
10. Harmony can be established only when the Christians observe their religion in private without encroaching on the domain of Hindu faith.
11. Conversions were affecting the family life as several families had broken up due to conversion activities.
12. Conversions due to inducement and allurements are not in the interest of the society.  There is nothing wrong in voluntary conversions.
13. The Resurgent Hindu society would not tolerate such proselytisation activities which aim at division rather than integration.
14. The Service activities of the Church were more  directed towards the ulterior motives of proselytisation.
15. The Hindus won’t harm the Christian faith in any way if they do it without forcing it on others.  And there would not be any cause for conflict.
16. There is no question of social boycott against Christians.  In fact, the Hindus are for cordial relations with Christians.
17. In case of any further problems, the problems would be solved through bilateral talks involving leaders of both sides.
18. The Hindu leaders made it clear that they did not support the attack on the building that housed the Cloistered Nuns.  They said that it was inadvertent and it would not be repeated.

The Church leaders put forth its view in the following manner

1. Christians are feeling insecure due to the recent spate of violence in New Life prayer halls
2. Is it wrong on our part to serve the society?
3. We don’t have anything to do with New Life activities except that both of us respect Jesus and Bible.
4. Hindu leaders may stop the Hindus from attending New Life congregational meetings.
5. Educate the Hindus in such a manner that they refrain from New Life activities.
6. In the case of Kandmal incidents, the Hindus had provoked the Christians through banners depicting the Christians in poor light
7. Any case of provocation from any side  is improper.
8. It should not happen.  Steps should be taken to improve relations.
9. Christians will not resort to conversions in South Kanara and Udupi district.
10. The Christian institutions will not prevent the school children from wearing Rakhi, Bindi, flowers et al that depict the Hindu faith.
11. The Christian educational institutions will not take the Hindu children to Church
12. Since the Catholic Christians do not have any connection with New Life missionaries, it would not object to any action against New Life in connection with proselytisation activities.
13. Since Bible and Cross are very holy in Christianity, the Hindus should not damage it any way.
14. The Christians would rein in their youths from violent activities henceforth.
15. The Christians are distressed with the attack on the cloistered Nuns inside the premises.