When the media, especially the Islamic apologists, say that Islam is a religion of peace and brotherhood, the first thing that crosses my mind is Taqiyya. Ahem, err… what’s this taqiyya.  In short, it is the Islamic licence to lie.

A specific justification for taqiyya by the Shi’as is the instance when ‘Ammar ibn al-Yasir (one of the companions loyal to ‘Ali and considered to be one of the first Shi’a) was detained and tortured by infidels (pagan/Hindus). He renounced his faith in order to escape and immediately went to Muhammad and repented. ‘Umar suggested that he be put to death for apostasy, however, Muhammad said that it was better for him to renounce his faith with his lips (while still believing in his heart) than to be burned to death by the infidels.

However, Taqia has several dimensions today.  Muslims in US started drinking liquor to infiltrate the US armed forces.  Their contention was that their alcoholism was their proof of renouncing Islam.  However, once inside, they started their fidayeen operation resulting in the infamous 9/11.

Taqia is also used in hoodwinking Hindu girls into conversion.  For instance, these jehadis/fidayeens even eat pork and say that they are only Muslims by birth.  They also drink alcohol to fool these modern naive Hindu girls into believing that their boyfriends are atheists.  However, once these girls fall into the taqiya jehadi trap, they start showing their true colours.

Taqia is also used to fool the naive media and other religionists.  They say that Islam believes in co-existence.  For this, they quote an ayath from the Koran which means: `To me, my religion.  To you, yours’.

What they do not say is that these ayat was used by Mohammed to fool the pagans of Medina who had the upper hand..  Remember, the so-called Prophet Mohammed was driven out of Medina.  His life was saved because he resorted to Taqiya.  However, Mohammed regrouped and butchered the pagans of Medina.

Taqia is very dangerous.  Never believe the white lies of Muslims.  It is nothing but Taqia.  Islam is a medieval religion whose commands are obvious: Allah is the only God. Mohammed is the final prophet.  Those who believe this are Mommins.  Those who disbelieve are Kafirs.  Kafirs should be killed or converted.  If you can’t do both, trouble them to the max.

So there you are, Islam is a religion of rape and violence.  To say to the contrary is nothing but taqiya.  Don’t be fooled.  If you are fooled, you will be like the pagans of Medina.  You will be history.

Make Islam history.  Relegate it to the textbooks.  That is the strong message to Hindu society.  And if you won’t, Hinduism will be extinct and we will all have Koran and Hadits as textbooks.  Don’t let that happen.

There are many of us who have subconsciously internalised the ubiqutous left media propaganda.  I have made a list of concepts which are taken for granted by our so-secular left media.  Have you taken them for granted.  Think over it.

1. Religion is the opium of the masses:

2. Politics is the last resort of scoundrels:

3.  All religions are the same:

4. Adivasis (tribals) are original Indians.  The rest (brahmins) are foreignors (Aryans) from Europe:

5. Hitler was vegetarian

6. Islam is a religion of peace and brotherhood.  Terrorists have hijacked Islam:

7. There is a direct connection between Nazis and Sangh Parivar

8. Zionists are evil.  Palestines are victims:

9. Confrontation is outdated. Treat terrorists as if they are victims:

10.  Communists, naxalites and armed revolutionaries are pro-poor up against powerful establishment:

11. Free sex is good for health:

12. Vegetarians are devoid of nutrition:

13.  There is no good and bad.  There is only moral relativity:

14. There is no God.  It is only an illusion to enslave the masses:

15. Yoga is nothing but a contortion of the body.

16. Pranayama is nothing but hyperventilation:

17. Meditation experiences are nothing but hallucinations:

18. Islam came as a liberation for Hindu superstitions:

19. Muhammed Ghazni was after Temple wealth and was not a religious plunderer:

20. Mughals were not jehadis.  They were patrons of art and culture.

21. Caste is nothing but racism.  Brahmins exploited KHAM (Kshatriya, Harijans, , Adivasis and Muslims.

The BJP lost because it was trying to be secular by abandoning Hindutva.  Thus spake Elst and he is right.

I must confess.  I am a big fan of Koenraad Elst.  Now Elst is not a legendary figure.  He is stout with a big beard and a hearty laugh.  I had the privilege of meeting and shaking hands with him — a moment that I cherish forever.

What I liked about Elst is his incisive perception and uncanny understanding of Hindusthan — something which most Hindus do not have.  I have a feeling that Elst is more Hindu than a Belgian Catholic to which he belongs.

To all those who don’t know Elst.  Koenraad Elst was born in Belgium.  He was a born Christian.  But he grew up to be a Hippie.  He abandoned his home, education, career and began travelling as a New Age freak.  He realised the hollowness of the new age movement.  He later travelled India and China studying its philosophy.  He came to Benares Hindu University where he stumbled upon Ram Swarup and Sitaram Goel (Voice of India Publications).  The rest is history.

Elst has written several books.  However, his classic is — Negationism in India, Decolonising Hindu Mind and Who is a Hindu.  You may read it in his website — http://koenraadelst.voiceofdharma.com/book.html

As for BJP’s defeat, read his views here

 http://www.dailypioneer.com/177112/BJP-apes-Congress-fails.html

Elst says that the BJP failed because the BJP had abandoned Hindutva and was trying to be secular like the Congress.  I agree completely with Elst.  When BJP was in power, it abandoned Ayodhya, it refused to talk about it.  And when election nears, they beat the Hindutva trumpet.  Now, do you think voters are such fools.  It’s high time that the BJP sticks to its core ideology.  Abandoning it is abandoning hopes.  Elst is right as usual.  Three cheers to our favourite firangi Hindu.

First of all, it is  not necessary that Hindus should believe in God as it is in Islam or Christianity.  That is because nothing is mandatory in Hinduism.  However, it is a fact that most of the Hindus are believers.  The best explanation for the concept of God in Hinduism (in my opinion) comes from Ramana Maharshi.  A seeker asked Ramana Maharshi: “Is god Advaita (without form), dwaita (with form) or vishistadwaita (with and without form)?”  The Sage replied, “God can be understood only when the ego which asked these questions ceases to exist”.

Nevertheless, Hinduism is free for all because freedom is the essence of Hinduism.  You can worship God in personal, impersonal, dual, non-dual or in any manner you wish.  The only condition is that God is personal and you should not impose your concept on others.

Personal God

In general Hinduism considers God not just as the Supreme All-powerful Gigantic One, Who commands the humanity to tread the way He/She/It says, but also a personal God Whom the individual can worship out of love and not necessarily out of fear ! The fear brings one only upto certain point and beyond that it repels, but love takes through to the point. Devotion or bhakti as often referred to is a very key concept in Hinduism, even for the philosophically inclined ones. While the shashtras - be it vedas, Agamas, purANas - describe the Glory of God, one finds abundance of stotras that praise the God in love.

God is Formless or with Form ?

For Hindus God, as is, is beyond any attributes of form, color, shapes … That is, God does not have any specific form or name. In this state God is referred to as nirguNa brahman (attributeless god). However God takes forms as perceived by humans and this perceived form is called saguNa brahman (god with (good) attributes). These forms could range from calm to fierce to yogic (1). Each form has its significance. For example when one is depressed and sees the form of God Strong and Powerful, the seeker feels the moral boost that God would definitely be the support for the right thing. Similarly when in an auspicious ceremony would like the God to be the calm provider of boons. In a spiritually elevated state, the choice would be the yogic form of God. The forms provide a basis for the Hindu worshipper to easily pursue the otherwise incomprehensible Supreme. So Hinduism supports both form as well as formless worship of the God. Whether one worships in saguNa or nirguNa way, it is ultimately the same God.

Let us hail the God, Who does not have a name or a form or anything like that, by singing thousands of Its names!
- thiruvAcakam

Is there an evil force against God ?

God is the Almighty and Supreme. So how can there be anything good or bad against It ? If the good things are the creation of God and bad things of some other evil force, will the gravitational force of the earth be attributed to God or the other force, as it is vital good element for us to live at the same time kills somebody who falls down from a high-rise building! In the system made by God, normally one gets to enjoy the good or bad things based on what have been their inclinations and the actions they made because of that. (This is called karma). There is no evil (satan type) against God. In fact atharva veda puts it very clearly,

“na dvitIyo na tR^itIyashchaturtho nApyuchyate
na pa.nchamo na ShaShThaH saptamo nApyuchyate
nAShTamo na navamo dashamo nApyuchyate
ya etaM devamekavR^itaM veda”There is none second to It, neither third not even fourth.
There is none fifth to It, neither sixth not even seventh.
There is none eighth to It, neither ninth not even tenth.
It is the only Supreme. This is to be known.

The concept of good and bad things is at a lower level and that too in a different way than strictly good and evil. The divines called devas are the protectors and the essentials who support the worlds. For example, air, sun, moon, water, fire etc. Those who disrupt the life supporting mechanism are the daemons called asuras. The conflicts between the two often arise and the Hindu epics talk in detail about them. However it should be kept in mind that as specified in purANas all the devAs are not the perfect beings and the asuras the worthless evils.

Is God in some heaven beyond ?

God is not just something that stays in a far off heaven, who would be met with after death, if one gets to heaven etc. God is omnipresent. It is right in front of us. Oh, It is right inside us too. Well, It is in each and every minute of the minute particle present/void anywhere! Does It stay in a world beyond ? Of course It does there too. (Very renowned gAyatri mantra hails the Supreme to be the earth, the world around and the skies beyond). One need not wait for the whole lifetime to get to meet God. The important concept in Hinduism is that God can be realized right here in this world and the God is not just Magnificent Almighty, but is also a sweet lovely One, with whom you can have a relationship - devotee, spouse, sibling, child, parent… God is not just in some heavens, It is right in us. It is both transcendental as well as intermixed in everything. Those who realize Its presence reap the grand reward.

Those who say He resides up in the sky, say so;
Those who say the Lord of divines residing down in the world beneath, say so.
I would say, the Lord of wisdom, Who got His throat brightly adorned with the stain of poison, is residing in my heart ! (2)

Is God a He ?

Hinduism says, God is not just a He. It is beyond the created contours of gender. For this reason the scriptures very often use the term “It” to refer to God apart from using He and She. Especially when it comes to the Supreme in the natural state (Formless, Attributeless), they prefer It to He or She. The form of Lord ardhanArIshvara(3) clearly conveys that God is masculine, feminine and neuter. When the God is called the Lord of all creatures, It is the God irrespective of the gender, animal race, or whatever other differentiation one could think of.

God is understood not only postulated

The beauty of Hinduism is that the concept of God is tried to be understood, experienced. There are purANas that elaborately tell through the voice of the divines the glory of God. These are one part. On the other hand the scriptures like upaniShads analyze through questioning and reasoning the concept of God. These two types go very much hand in hand. Neither the divine glory limited to the reaches of the human mind with the purANa like scriptures telling the things beyond the normal human reach. At the same time they do not command a blind following of some super-human texts, but also very much permit analysis. The presence of a range of philosophies in Hindu system is the testimony of this. There are texts like yogasutras that cover the scope from reasoning to divine glory too. So the total and complete spectrum of human verification to super-human wisdom is richly available for the smooth progress of the follower in Hinduism. No need to be blind-folded, explore your way to the Supreme !!

Those who did not get the deeper sense out, keep lecturing out the book-confined knowledge.
- aRpudhath thiruvandhAdhi

No sooner that you mention that you are a vegetarian, the leftists have got a ready answer to malign you, “Even Hitler was a vegetarian”.

As Khushwant Singh once told L K Advani, “You don’t smoke, drink, eat meat or womanise, then you are a dangerous man”.

Even Hitler didn’t smoke, drink, eat meat and was loyal to his girlfriend Eva.  So in case, you don’t have the good qualities of non-veg, booze and hoes, you are a dangerous man.  Swell logic.  Isn’t it.  To top it all, Hitler was an Aryan and used the Hindu symbol Swastika.

Too bad if you are a Hindu. You have to prove that you are not a Hitler.

This is the way the leftists backed by Christians insultl Hindus.  (Remmeber, Muzziz, Christians, Leftists and all other lobbies are united against Hindus in India). 

Now for the facts.

• Hitler was not a vegetarian.  He only tried to be a vegetarian for a brief period.  However, his non-veg palate could not tolerate it.  So he was back to the eminently Christian bacons and Hams.
• Hitler had no love for the Hindus. He simply believed the discredited Aryan invasion theory and falsely conceived of the Swastika as a German symbol (read Aryan).
• Hitler was eminently Christian, although he didn’t like the Church as he reportedly told the Pope, “I have only done what the Church has only done — only better”.
• While it is true that Hitler was a one-woman man, that has more to do with his secretiveness and lack of trust.  It is evident in the way he poisoned his fiancee first before killing himself.

So Hindus have got complaints against all those Lefitsts/Christians/Muslims/other lobbies who are unjustly comparing Hindus to Hitler.

The Swastika is ours.  Vegetarianism is a by-word for non-violence.  Please don’t compare peaceful Hindus to a crank called Hitler.  We are wise in our own rights.  If you still want to spread those Hitler canards, do it.

YOU WILL HAVE NO TAKERS.

According to R Vaidyanathan, professor of finance at the Indian Institute of Management, Indian money to the tune of more than Rs. 75 lakh crore is stashed in Swiss Bank.  If this amount is brought back, our entire national debts as well as other debts can be paid back and will be the road to prosperity.

Following increased terrorism in recent years, Swiss Bank has made a provision to plough back the money if the Government asks for it.

The BJP has made it very clear in its manifesto that it will take steps to bring the amount stashed in Swiss Bank while others are dithering on it. However, as usual, there is the only spanner in the wheel — the Congress party.

This is what the Congress Crown Prince Rahul Gandhi has to say, “The BJP will forget its promises of unlocking the money because there is no such money anyway”.   It is an open secret that the Nehruvian Stalinists in the Congress had cheated the country by siphoning billions of funds into Swiss Bank.

Now the Congress is getting jittery with the Swiss Bank decision to return the funds in case the funds are being used for anti-national activities.  We all know how Bofors and Quattrochi used Swiss Bank for funnelling kickbacks.  The BJP thinktank is right.  The money has to be brought back.

A man wanted his new bike to be blessed by a Hindu priest, Mullah and Padre.

So he invited all the three of them to his house.

The Hindu priest lit the camphor and waved it before the bike.

The Padre poured holy water and blessed the bike.

The Mullah came with a hacksaw and cut two inches of the silencer.

Circumcision is the only way to reach Allah.

Postscript: Why is Raymonds not available in Islamic nations?
Because all Muslims are incomplete by two inches.

I was watching this video on the CNN-IBN website.  Was surprised at the way, this electronic media giant passed judgement on Hindus as if it is an expert.  It said that Varun Gandhi is fighting for the rights of Hindus — who are suffering from imaginary persecution. This is the most stupid statement that can ever be made.

3 lakh Kashmir Pandits were hounded out of Kashmir by jehadi Muslims: Is it imaginary?

100 killed in Mumbai blasts: Is it imaginary?

Pakistani Hindus who were 19 percent in 1948 are only about one percent today.  Is it imaginary?

Millions of cattle — considered divine by the Hindus — are killed in illegal slaughter house.  Is it imaginary?

Thousands of rapes (most of them unreported) takes place in Muslim majority areas.  In Pakistan and Bangladesh, it is taking place openly.  Is that imaginary?

The India Today mag has brought out a special cover on Islamic terrorism in India.  Is it imaginary?

CNN-IBN suffers from dhimmi mentality.  It says real jehadi violence does not exist (read Mohammed Afzal).  However, it does another magnificent somersault when it says that real violence against Hindus is nothing but imaginary persecution.

So can we have imaginary human rights activists for the Hindus who are suffering from imaginary persecution.  A Teesta Setalvad perhaps who keeps harping about imaginary jehadi victims.

Postscript: These TV channels do a rehash of Gujarat riots without mentioning Godhra where 68 Hindu pilgrims were roasted alive.

The verses from Hathras Tulsi’s Ghat Ramayan flows like this: Ek Ram Dasharath Ka Beta, Ek Ram Ghat Ghat pe Bhaitha, Ek Ram Ka Sakal Jag Pasara, Aur Ek Ram hai Sab se Nyara (One Ram is the son of Dasharath, The Other Ram pervades every speck of existence, Yet other Ram is spread across the Universe, And another Ram is the most lovable). The verse only indicates that Ram is not just a god, not just a person.  Ram is the central motivator for the entire universe.  Ram is that soundless sound that reverberates across existence.

When Sage Veda Vyasa composed the Vedas, the commoners could not comprehend it.  So he wrote the Bhagavatham to ensure that the common man could bond with the divine.  The common man with his low IQ and high EQ could feel the Bhagavatham with his heart.  Thus began the age of Bhakti (devotion) where it is said that singing the name of the divine was enough to liberate mankind from all the vicious sins that could ever be conceived.

The same can be said about Ramayana.  The real Ramayana is the story of the human soul caught in the vortex of Maya (Illusion).  Ram is supposed to be the God.  Sita is supposed to be the soul.  Hanuman is supposed to be the devotee uniting the soul with its beloved God. That is about the spiritual dimension of Ramayana.  The material drama was actually played in the Treta Yuga (eons ago) to demonstrate the ideal man.  Ram is not a person in this sense.  He is the Godhead, taking birth in the human plane, only to demonstrate the epitome of human existence.

The Hindu vibes with Ram is indeed great.  Ayodhya — the birth place of Ram — has been venerated all along and Ram Naam (the divine name) is played throughout the year non-stop for such is the stuff that faith is made of.

Unfortunately for the Hindus, Jehadis made it a point to denigrate this very cornerstone of Hindu faith.  Chronicles have it on record that Babur demolished the Ram Temple in Ayodhya with a view to denigrate Hinduism.  Though the karsewaks demolished Babur’s mosque in the year 1991, there only exists a make-shift Temple for Ram.

The entire pseudosecularist brigade — accompanied by the Mullah-Missionary-Comrade cacaphony — is hellbent on denying a Temple for the most popular Hindu God. 

Building a Temple for Ram is only the starting point for Ramarajyam (utopian society).  Hindus would do well to elect a pro-Hindu government at the centre to ensure that we get a grand Temple for Ram.  That would ensure the beginning of Ramarajyam — without the dhobi who suspected Sita, of course.  For, I am sure, that the dhobi is now reborn as a pseudosecularist and he must be in a very high position in our sickular media.